Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. Linked : the new science of networks Item Preview.
EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Includes bibliographical references p. Indeed, networks are pervasive--from the human brain to the Internet to the economy to our group of friends. The book is carefully structured and visually pleasing, with lots of colorful diagrams, figures, tables, and schematics to help convey fundamental concepts and ideas.
Its pedagogical value is significantly enhanced by a Tufte-style exposition that recognizes and works with the nonlinear character of learning. The wide margins contain bits of information … that expand on the main text. The passion of the author for his field is reflected in the book he has written. The debate spanned seven papers and two years and is one of the most vicious scientific disagreement on re- cord. Like earlier objections, these are invalid.
The difference is particularly relevant for sult 5. The analytical predictions do not provide the exact perfactors, hence the lines are not fits, but in- Note that while 5. Indeed, as we show in Figure 5. The difference comes The dependence of the average clustering co- in the lnN 2 term, that increases the clustering coefficient for large N. The continuous line corre- sponds to the analytical prediction 5.
The dashed and continuous curves are not fits, but are drawn to indicate the pre- dicted N dependent trends. Returning to our earlier analogy, the networks generated by these models relate to real networks like a photo of a painting relates to the painting itself: It may look like the real one, but the process of generating a photo is drastically different from the process of painting the original painting.
Hence, it aims to paint the painting again, coming as close as possible to the original brush strokes. Consequently, the modeling philosophy behind the model is simple: to un- derstand the topology of a complex system, we need to describe how it came into being.
Random networks, the configuration and the hidden parameter models will continue to play an important role as we explore how certain network characteristics deviate from our expectations.
We offered a necessary and sufficient argument to address this question. First, we showed that growth and preferential at- tachment are jointly needed to generate scale-free networks, hence if one of them is absent, either the scale-free property or stationarity is lost. Sec- ond, we showed that if they are both present, they do lead to scale-free net- works. This argument leaves one possibility open, however: Do these two mechanisms explain the scale-free nature of all networks?
Could there be some real networks that are scale-free thanks to some completely dif- ferent mechanism? This finding underscores a more general pattern: To date all known models and real systems that are scale-free have been found to BOX 5. Do the distributions "converge"? Each new node has m directed links.
Growth Without Preferential Attachment Derive the degree distribution 5. With the help of a computer, generate a network of nodes using Model A. Measure the degree distribution and check that it is consistent with the prediction 5. Next we derive it using the rate equa- tion approach [12, 13]. The method is sufficiently general to help explore the properties of a wide range of growing networks. Consequently, the cal- culations described here are of direct relevance for many systems, from models pertaining to the WWW [16, 17, 18] to describing the evolution of the protein interaction network via gene duplication [19, 20].
Let us denote with N k,t the number of nodes with degree k at time t. That is, at any moment the total number of nodes equals the number of timesteps BOX 5. Our goal is to calculate the changes in the number of nodes with degree k after a new node is added to the network. We next apply 5. Following the same arguments we used to derive 5. Let us use the fact that we are looking for a stationary degree distribution, an expectation supported by numerical simulations Figure 5.
Using this we can write the l. Therefore the rate equations 5. We use a recursive approach to obtain the degree distribution. Finally, the rate equation formalism offers an elegant continuum equa- tion satisfied by the degree distribution [16]. We follow Ref.
For this we write the sum 5. We denote the probability to have a link between node i and j with P i,j. Therefore, the probability that three nodes i, j, l form a triangle is P i,j P i,l P j,l.
The expected number of triangles in which node l with degree kl participates is thus given by the sum of the probabilities that node l participates in tri- angles with arbitrary chosen nodes i and j in the network. Hence the probability that at its arrival node j links to node i with degree ki is given by preferential attachment ki j ki j. Hence 5. Emergence of scaling in random net- works. Science, , Eggenberger and G.
A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclu- sions of Dr. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, , Paris, France, Human behavior and the principle of least resort. Addi- son-Wesley Press, Oxford, England, On a class of skew distribution functions.
Biometrika, , De Solla Price. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumula- tive advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, , The Matthew effect in science. Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus, New York, Riordan, J. Spencer, and G. The degree se- quence of a scale-free random graph process. Random Structures and Al- gorithms, , Jeong, R.
Mean-field theory for scale free random networks. Physica A, , Dorogovtsev, J. Mendes, and A. Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. Krapivsky, S. Redner, and F. Connectivity of growing random networks. Jeong, Z. Measuring preferential attach- ment in evolving networks.
Europhysics Letters, , Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. E , Dorogovtsev and J. Evolution of networks. Oxford Clarendon Press, Kleinberg, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tom- kins. The Web as a graph: measurements, models and methods.
Proceed- ings of the International Conference on Combinatorics and Computing, Rajalopagan, D. Divakumar, A. Tom- kins, and E. The Web as a graph. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on principles of database systems, Pastor-Satorras, E. Smith, and R. Evolving protein minterac- tion networks through gene duplication. Vazquez, A. Flammini, A. Maritan, and A. Modeling of protein interaction networks. ComPlexUs —44, The economic approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, Fabrikant, E.
Koutsoupias, and C. Heuristically optimized trade-offs: a new paradigm for power laws in the internet.
0コメント